Ïëîùàäêà "Ìàðêåòèíã, ðåêëàìà, PR" |
| Âîïðîñ îò Cooler111 äîáàâëåí 07-11 19:53 |
|
We need someone with experience http://xxx-xxxxx.in.net/ free xxx “I found it amazing, and it broke my heart a little bit, that when I would gives speeches and say, you know I married that guy from ‘Eat, Pray, Love,’ people would start clapping and cheering. http://9taxi.in.net/ 9 taxi “The exhibit experience will include hands-on interactive exhibits, real aircraft and spacecraft and high resolution audio-visual interactive exhibits both to create themed learning experiences and to evoke the continuous motion of the aircraft and spacecraft on display,” Bazela said. http://youjizz.in.net/ ujizz “It’s always a challenge to make Andy laugh,” Llodra said afterwards, “but every time I achieve it, it is because I am losing. Maybe I would prefer to not make him laugh, and win at least once.” http://online-levitra.in.net/ levitra generic Your obvious sarcasm aside, the key thing here is your use of the term "legalization". It all depends on what is meant by that. Any group of consenting adults can live together as polygamists if they so choose. It would be an entirely different matter if such a group were to demand the same legal benefits (tax law, employer health benefits, etc) as legally recognized unions between two adults. That would be up to each individual state to decide. I personally would not support such law because I think extending such legal rights beyond two people is too burdensome upon governments and employers, not to mention the civil law nightmares associated with dissolution, property rights, etc. But I don't see anything against such a thing constitutionally. However, it would be unconstitutionally discriminatory if such laws were to disallow any particular sex combination of such unions. http://xnxxnxxn.in.net/ xnxx Benchmark crude for September delivery was up 34 cents to $108.21 a barrel at early afternoon Bangkok time in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The now expired August contract closed up 1 cent at $108.05 on Friday after trading as high as $109.32 earlier in the day.
|
| Îòâåò |
|
|
| *Èìÿ: | E-mail: |
| *Òåìà: | |
*Âîïðîñ:
|
|
|
| Ïðåäûäóùèé âîïðîñ
Ñïèñîê âîïðîñîâ
Ñëåäóþùèé âîïðîñ
|
