главная
>>
клуб
>>площадка "Маркетинг, реклама, PR"
Площадка "Маркетинг, реклама, PR"
Вопрос от Joseph добавлен
13-04 17:48
I'd like to open a personal account http://xxxnx.fun/pornxnxx/ freelivechat There is already chatter that Pentagon boosters in Congress will try to take advantage of the situation and turn off the lower defense spending caps mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011. Whatever you think about the proposal to take action in Syria, it must not be used as a cudgel to undo the first effective budget control measure in a generation, albeit an imperfect one. The point of the ActВ was to get Congress and the president to get serious about the enormous debt facing this country. Congress and the president told their fellow Americans and the world that they were going to enact measure that would generate $1.2 trillion in budget cuts – whether through spending cuts or revenue raisers or a combination of both. Their abdication of responsibility is what got the across-the-board cuts known as sequestration started. Using a hundred million dollars worth of cruise missiles as a justification to turn off hundreds of billions of dollars in deficit reduction is more of the same irresponsible budgeting that has left us more than $16 trillion in debt. Any effort to link taking action in Syria to sheltering the Pentagon from the effects of sequestration should be rejected.
Ответ
*Имя:
E-mail:
*Тема:
*Вопрос:
Предыдущий вопрос
Список вопросов
Следующий вопрос
действующие площадки
Стратегия развития ...
Управление персоналои ...
Маркетинг, реклама, PR
Правовое сопровождение ...
элитный клуб
Имя:
Пароль:
карта сайта
|
главная
|
о проекте
|
новости
|
услуги
|
тренинги и семинары
|
клуб
|
презентация
©2000 В.Г. Паршков, журнал P&P
E-mail:
info@pplus.ru
